
As I’m fairly positive everybody is aware of, final week the Cooper Flagg Rookie Debut Patch Auto (or “RDPA”) bought for $8,040,000. Dylan Harper’s bought for $2.88M, and Kon Knueppel’s went for $2.34M. The athletes have been, r, “the thirty fourth, thirty fifth and thirty sixth athletes throughout all sports activities to ever have a buying and selling card promote publicly for a minimum of $1M.”
To present the Flagg sale some context, it bought for greater than any Honus Wagner (a minimum of any identified to the general public), and all however one 1952 Mantle (an SGC 9.5 from a 2022 Heritage public sale). What I feel is tremendous spectacular right here in the midst of all of it – and I don’t need it to get misplaced within the mixture of the costs – is that somebody at Topps, sooner or later, got here up with the good concept of placing the RDPA on a uniform after which onto a card, and NOW another person satisfied the man who discovered it to promote it on Fanatics Accumulate. They’ve created an unbelievable, immediately-important collectible out of skinny air – and now preserve it of their ecosystem lengthy sufficient to get a chunk of the secondary market sale. The RDPA could be the most vital buying and selling card innovation since grading. And earlier than that, Benchwarmers. And earlier than that… playing cards in cigarette packs, possibly? We must always rank these someday.
Anyway, the information of those gross sales is nice… for a really small group of individuals. However I feel most of us nonetheless simply wish to purchase a bodily blaster of some enjoyable playing cards and hope for an autograph of virtually anybody. As a result of it’s a thrill. Has it gotten too far out of attain for the common collector? I don’t assume so. The Skenes RDPA was d. The Flagg got here from a $515 spot in a break – by breakers who weren’t universally reviled. These loopy costs aren’t a brand new phenomenon; it simply feels ickier now, with grifters like Kevin O’Leary cosplaying as one of many Paul brothers. However does anybody else keep in mind Wayne Gretzky and Bruce McNall shopping for a T206 Wagner in 1991 for the then-unheard of worth of $410,000? That was enormous information. Due to m for the power to at all times pull stuff like this:

It additionally gave us the secondary present of y. Right here’s a style:

As soon as your eyeballs cease bleeding, I’d wish to guarantee you of this – right now’s publication will likely be for the common folks!
Now let’s get to the traditional Greeks!
The thinker Heraclitus as soon as stated, “a person can’t step into the identical river twice.”
I considered this as I used to be sitting in a movie show final week, watching The Transformers: The Film, which was re-released (and just lately prolonged!) in theaters y. I hoped that, as Scorching Rod and Daniel raced to Lookout Mountain, and the acquainted chords of Stan Bush’s “Dare” blasted in theatrical encompass sound, I might be transported again to my childhood, overtaken by goosebumps and chills, stuffed with the nice and cozy glow of the Matrix of Management.
I used to be not.
As an alternative, the scene simply got here and went. I’m unsure why – the theater’s lack of any actual encompass sound didn’t assist; the expertise was advantageous nevertheless it wasn’t a full-on fashionable movie show outing. Perhaps it’s as a result of I’ve seen the film a number of occasions the previous couple of years at house. Perhaps I’ve simply misplaced my middle and sense of self, as Mantel CEO Evan Parker usually suggests. However as I used to be questioning the place the nice and cozy fuzzies have been, I used to be reminded of Heraclitus, whose saying mainly meant – to me, a minimum of; your interpretation might range – sure, you’ll be able to technically stroll into that very same river once more, however you might be modified and the river is modified, and the dying of Optimus Prime won’t ever hit the identical.
I put my concept to the check throughout the later rendition of Stan Bush’s different traditional, “The Contact.” I remembered it fondly, however wasn’t taken to a brand new non secular airplane. Heraclitus strikes once more.
As I drove house in tears, I remembered one thing I noticed earlier within the day – a Topps Chrome MLS Huge Chicken Superfractor that was y. And, as luck would have it, I used to be already shopping for obscure packs of stickers from the 1978 “Americana Sesamstrasse” set, in the hunt for the Cookie Monster rookie. I used to be excited to get these packs. Perhaps, I believed to myself, it actually was the crappy sound within the theater.
Looking for the Cookie Monster rookie isn’t a simple job; the Sesamstrasse set has a number of Cookie Monster playing cards/stickers within the set. My line of considering is usually this – the “true” rookie is the lowest-numbered one within the set. Nonetheless, if there was one in all him consuming a cookie, that may seemingly qualify because the one folks would need. Very like how we logically concluded that the Jennifer Lopez rookie was the one along with her title on it, and never the lower-number one which simply stated “The Fly Women.”
Because it seems, there aren’t any cookie-eating playing cards. So now we’re chasing 7, which can be the cleanest and most simple image within the set of him:

There’s a secondary challenge right here. There was additionally a 1978 set of children’ counting playing cards by an organization referred to as “Western” that some eBay sellers try to move off as Cookie Monster’s rookie. I name shenanigans – rounded corners and a quantity on the again (on this case, the quantity “1” and an image of a pear) level to what’s primarily a deck of playing cards the place what you’re getting, not a sealed pack of random stickers and playing cards. With out the randomness, what are we doing right here?

So, if we will all conform to be on the identical web page, I’d wish to open up my three packs of Sesamstrasse with everybody studying Mail Day. However first…
Facet notice: I watched The Goonies the opposite night time and bought the goosebumps from “Good Sufficient,” so possibly I do nonetheless have a soul! Take that, CEO Evan Parker!
Extra aspect notice: I purchased r from the 1985 Topps set for $16.

I beforehand had purchased a Mikey, however with the popular culture wave hitting playing cards now, I had an inside debate over which character was extra iconic. Worst case? I now have each.
Facet aspect notice: There clearly d you will get for about $12.
Unrelated aspect notice: Leaf’s “p” set seems to be actually nice. On reflection I ought to have handed on Benihana and spent the $40 on these as a substitute.
Okay, let’s take a look at these playing cards! Spoiler alert: This was extra disappointing than my Transformers expertise.
They appear nice on the surface!

The again:

However they’re SMALL. Right here’s a Jennifer Capriati rookie for reference:

As you’ll be able to see, we DID get a Cookie Monster, nevertheless it was not the #7. I additionally bought… a pumpkin. And a few flowers.
How about this desk?

TABLE ROOKIE!!
I’m going to spare you the remaining and fast-forward to the total haul. I one way or the other managed two Berts, two blue guys, and 4 inanimate/natural objects. Lesson discovered. Subsequent time we’re looking for the Voltron sticker rookie from a non-German set.
Have a gander:

However hey… I bought desk, faucet, flowers, and pumpkin! They’re colourful. That’s a win. But it surely’s off to eBay for the #7 sticker.
Epilogue: As I used to be throwing away the wrappers, I observed one thing in one of many packs. Might it’s…

SOMEONE CALL BRUCE McNALL!!!























